Machine Learning Approaches for Security Vulnerability Detection in Software Testing
Main Article Content
Abstract
As software systems continue to form the backbone of essential infrastructure and digital services, the issue of their security grows ever more pressing. Conventional approaches to uncovering vulnerabilities static code analysis, dynamic testing, and manual inspection among them are frequently time-consuming, prone to oversight, and increasingly inadequate in the face of today’s large-scale, fast-evolving development environments. In light of these challenges, this study turns to machine learning (ML) as a means to augment vulnerability detection within software testing workflows. Rather than providing a purely theoretical overview, the paper engages with a broad spectrum of ML techniques including both classical supervised and unsupervised models as well as more recent deep learning architectures and evaluates their practical applicability across different testing contexts.
Particular attention is given to the comparative behavior of specific algorithms such as Decision Trees, Support Vector Machines, Random Forests, and various forms of neural networks when tested on established benchmark datasets. These models are assessed not only on performance metrics like accuracy and false positive rates, but also in terms of scalability and adaptability to the constraints of real-world systems. Beyond this, the paper introduces an ensemble-based framework that integrates static code characteristics with dynamic execution data, aiming to improve overall detection reliability.
Results from our experimental implementation suggest that ML-driven approaches can significantly enhance the identification of both known and previously unseen (zero-day) vulnerabilities, often with fewer false alarms compared to traditional methods. Nevertheless, the study does not claim ML as a panacea; several limitations are acknowledged, particularly in relation to model interpretability, potential data biases, and the risk of overfitting in highly variable environments. Ethical implications surrounding automated vulnerability discovery especially regarding disclosure and potential misuse are also considered. In closing, the paper outlines directions for future inquiry, emphasizing the need for robust, explainable, and ethically grounded ML tools within the domain of software security testing.